≡ Menu

Value of EDA

in Complex Events, Event Driven Architecture, Event Processing, Events

Link to a presentation given on EDA by K. Mani Chandy of Cal Tech: http://complexevents.com/?p=93

He introduces a strategy he calls BAM++ which makes a lot of sense:

-snip-

“Here’s a strategy that will work for many of your enterprises. I call it a BAM++ strategy. The idea is to start with BAM and then add a function: determine if reality deviates from expectation.

The value proposition is that instead of having the business user, say the CFO, continuously monitor the portal, the EDA system will monitor the portal for the user. When something significant happens then (1) alert the appropriate people, and (2) bring links to the appropriate tools into the portal with links to the appropriate data, so that the business user can immediately respond to the threat or opportunity.

The value proposition here is the attention amplifier. This helps the business user amplify his/her attention, and respond rapidly with appropriate tools when a situation arises.

The advantage of the BAM application is that the sensor data — the data that identifies reality — is already present; it’s sending data to the portal. So, you don’t need to connect to new data sources. Secondly, the issue of error is already understood. If the data shows up in the portal, it is sufficiently accurate to be useful. Thirdly, improving BAM seems less radical than developing an event-driven application.”

-snip-

Comments on this entry are closed.

  • Doug,

    Thanks for digging this one up. BAM is an important issue right now in my world, and I’m trying to work out how to convince clients the value of a machine monitoring their data rather than an ops or finance person having to stare at a portal waiting for things to go wrong!

    Cheers
    Phil

  • Phil,

    My pleasure! BAM is also one of my deep interests. I’d love to hear more about what you’re doing in this area.

    Thanks for your comments,

    Doug

Next post:

Previous post: