From the category archives:

BSM Solution Analysis

As I look back at how the BSM industry evolved in 2009, my thoughts focus around 2009 as the year of “Hybrid BSM” players coming into their place in the market. Another term I use here is “BSM for SMB” or even “BSM Lite” to some degree but I feel “Hybrid BSM” is best fitting as it describes what these solutions provide. I see a “Hybrid BSM” product as a single product that incorporates many aspects of fundamental infrastructure, application and service management and monitoring along with some fundamental and foundational BSM capability. These don’t fit into a stand alone “Pure Play BSM” product category nor do they need to have additional stand alone products playing together to achieve BSM value as a “Portfolio BSM” solution would.

So who were the players in 2009? Here’s my ten second highlights reel.

Nimsoft launched their initial BSM story with the release of their solution incorporating their Indicative Software acquisition. FireScope continued to dominate much of 2009 with new releases and solutions in “upline” areas such as compliance. Zyrion was launched and really came out as the one to plug into the “BSM for SMB” space. Manage Engine leveraged their heritage AdventNet portfolio with the IT360 offering and launched the first “BSM as a Service” with Manage Engine on Demand offering. AccelOps came out of stealth mode and launched their extensive hybrid solution with both a SaaS and Virtual Appliance delivery model for broad based IT management and BSM. Monolith Software picked up speed and clients with strong focus on IT operations needs and core BSM foundations. The second half of 2009 saw many of these companies jumping on the virtualization and cloud computing band wagon. This is a natural fit for the target markets many of these vendors play in as virtualization and cloud computing took off in 2009 and will grow exponentially in 2010+.

Apart from the typical vendor “we do that” announcements of doing BSM for X, Y or Z in 2009, I haven’t seen any real innovation from the typical “Big 4″ or “Other 6″ vendors who participate in the BSM space. Releases throughout 2009 focused on portfolio consolidation, integration and optimization as well as incorporating “new” capabilities or extending support for the 2009 buzzwords around cloud computing, virtualization, green IT, optimization, etc. I think there are a couple vendors who’ve made significant improvements across their portfolio in 2009, especially in capability consolidation, ease of use and licensing innovation as well as some key acquisitions that have the potential to be “break out moves” for their BSM capability in 2010+.

Regarding my virtualization and cloud computing band wagon comment, I still struggle to see this as anything but a natural evolution and application of a vendor’s standard IT management and monitoring fundamentals. Until we have innovative vendor solutions that can truly manage the “end-to-end”, “top to bottom”, “side to side”, “domain to domain”, “provider to provider” services, across any and all technologies, on premise or off, in the cloud or not, from a transactional flow, workload performance, user experience and ultimately with an understanding of the state of the business’ goals, objectives and outcomes, I’m just challenged to be impressed at this point. Yes my expectations are high. Yes I’m sure many are “working on it”. The industry must set the “bar high” and start addressing the broader based “death from a 1000 cuts” problem in IT operations environments today.

In addition to 2009 being the year of “Hybrid BSM”, I also consider 2009 to be a year filled with innovation and growth in many key BSM enabling technology and product areas. End user experience (EUE), real user monitoring (RUM), quality of experience (QoE) and business transaction management (BTM) vendors and solutions matured and improved in 2009. OpTier, Precise, Nastel, Correlsense, AmberPoint, Aternity, Symphoniq (Coradiant), Knoa, Keynote, Gomez (Compuware), Digital Fuel, Oblicore (CA) and newScale all kept my interests peeked with advances in their capabilities and techniques for providing visibility into some of the most critical areas of service delivery and the things that often have the most direct impact on business goals, objectives and outcomes.

My thoughts for 2010 swirl around the continued M&A potential in the space. As I type this today, the independent SLA player Oblicore looks to be snatched up by CA. I think that more consolidation will take place in the BTM area by folks in the “Hybrid BSM” camp, “Big4″ or “Other6″. These BTM vendors are rapidly evolving and addressing deep technology challenges within the constantly emerging technology and protocol landscape. The capability to have rich end user experience visibility is so valuable some vendors may want to extend beyond their synthetic or limited sampling approaches. My thoughts on any M&A activity in this new decade are that it must be around portfolio and product consolidation, addressing gaps and striving for a simpler, more efficient footprint for anyone desiring to achieve broad based coverage. Gone should be the days of “add ons” and more “stand alone” products. Simplify, simplify, simplify. If it’s not broke, think about it differently and you may see that it really is “broke”! Make the right decisions to fix or simplify it. The “Not Invented Here” (NIH) mentality often leaves you standing at the alter when others have acquired capability and made the right decisions to move their products and solutions forward.

Will there be any significant, game changing BSM innovation in 2010? Time will tell. I’ve seen some pretty interesting concepts being tossed around in the industry lately. It’s a matter of market timing and client maturity in most instances. Any mis-timing, things come across as “gimmicky” or just another fad. Hit the market right because a foundation has been built helping clients and the industry realize what they need, know what they don’t know, then these will certainly be game changers. Those vendors who go to market with as much emphasis on the people, process, organizational and political challenges of BSM understood, addressed, acknowledged and mitigated will see deep, broad based BSM adoption and success. 2010-2013 will be the pivotal years for this.

I look forward to the next decade of Business Service Management! My passion remains high, my vision clear, and belief that the value and benefits from BSM can be realized unshaken. BSM can provide measurable value to the typical IT operations organization and business. How you choose to achieve that value is a journey filled with many decisions, challenges, roadblocks and times of uncertain pain and reward. My hope is to help you get there!

{ 15 comments }

Align BSM first!! Strategic Capability Network for BSM

by Robin Harwani on February 12, 2009

We often talk about aligning IT with Business is a key aspect and that BSM is a very powerful and unique solution to achieve this objective. But what about BSM itself, how do we ensure that BSM is aligned with value proposition that it is supposed to offer? What capabilities & resources do we need to be successful in BSM space? After spending years of finding an answer to this question,  I have found a framework which solves this problem.  Strategic Capability Network is a framework to explicitly associate resources to scenarios, allowing formulation of a strategic plan that dynamically controls investment in resources as new scenarios are forecast and visited. It is essentially a framework that provides assessment of the costs of supporting resources and the value of strategic positions, and the propagation of costs to supported capabilities and strategic positions, and the propagation of value to supporting capabilities and resources.

This framework allows us to do some retrospection of how WE associate the “Value” that we claim to offer with BSM, with the “Capabilities” that WE have, and “Resources”  that WE need. If you are a BSM/SQM offering organization or planning to have BSM as a value proposition,  I strongly recommend looking at this framework. If you are an executive evaluating what resources/cultural changes you require, I urge you to leverage this framework.

To anchor the understanding with an example, I have taken some of the commonly claimed value propositions of BSM, associated them to the capabilities and resources in the below diagram based on my experience. You might have a different philosophy to the values and association to capabilities and resources (and you should; thats what makes companies different),  but I think this is one of the only framworks which provides this amount of detailed specification on how you trace every asset back to the value you are offering.

Using this framework, every BSM offering organization can create its own unique values and associate them to the capabilities and resources, to align themselves first. I hope this is useful and as they say “Alignment  begins at home!!”

{ 2 comments }

Realizing A BSM Solution: Implementation Perspective

Realizing a BSM solution is a complex task and has a lot of challenges involved which are not just technology related but also related to process, organization, cultural and expectations. Lack of standardization of the process for implementing BSM is a major factor resulting in failures and unmet expectations. Most companies planning/currently trying to implement BSM [...]

Read the full article →

A Quick BSM Readiness Assessment for the IBM Tivoli Monitoring (ITM) Suite

Today, competitive Business Service Management solutions must provide quick time to value, be highly effective, easy to implement and manage and truly enable progress towards a business aligned organization and operations. In my efforts to assess and increase the Business Service Management readiness of our vast products within IBM Tivoli, I’ve just completed a quick [...]

Read the full article →

The Super Bowl of Business Service Management

Cutting through the Business Service Management hype between vendors is tough these days. With no standard industry accepted definition as to what BSM is, every vendor is free to define their own story and path towards BSM success. I have proposed my own definition and collected what many others have defined BSM to be.
I see [...]

Read the full article →

Will Compuware 2.0 include a clear BSM story and viable solution?

Compuware has been a sleeper for some time in the Business Service Management space. Last year with their purchase of Proxima I expected things to change. I have personal experience with deployment of the Vantage suite, specifically the Client Vantage and Application Vantage products. I was very fond of the Adlex technology and product as [...]

Read the full article →

BSM Solution Analysis: Netuitive Service Analyzer

I’ve been asked a lot of the past few years what my opinion is on this company or that solution, product, technology. While I don’t have actual hands on experience with every one of those companies, solutions, products, etc. I’ve always been able to pick apart the sales and marketing slicks and get to [...]

Read the full article →