thoughts on business, service and technology operations and management
Random header image... Refresh for more!

Posts from — May 2008

links for 2008-05-21

May 20, 2008   1 Comment

FireScope Business Edition (BE) Launched

FireScope’s countdown excitement was revealed today (a little bit late :-) ) and their next steps in Business Service Management innovation are now visible. It appears that there will be a 28 day launch cycle of numerous new products and tools.

FireScope’s Business Edition (BE) concept consists of a couple key components aimed as initial entry points for smaller enterprises. The fuller featured Enterprise Editions (EE) are the natural migration paths or starting point for larger enterprises. Pricing modelers are available right on their website.

Some of the “coming soon” tools looks like it puts them in company with PacketTrap and SolarWinds. FireScope BSM:BE and CMDB:BE puts them in company with Nimsoft and Managed Objects.

BSM BE

Optimized for the unique needs of small to medium sized businesses and starting at only $2,450, FireScope BSM:BE features an engaging and user-friendly interface and flexible auto discovery provides rapid time to competency, with multiple setup wizards and inline help designed to make implementation accessible for any level of user.

CMDB BE

FireScope CMDB:Business-Edition delivers the same enterprise-grade functionality as traditional CMDB’s, minus the exhorbitant price tag and pain inducing deployment. For less than $10,000, IT Organizations gain real-time visualization and documentation of their infrastructure along with a complete view of the interrelationships of the software and systems impacting those operations, without the need to hire an army of consultants and mind-numbing planning sessions.

Hmm, the free trial download isn’t available to me yet. Anyone else?

May 20, 2008   1 Comment

links for 2008-05-20

May 19, 2008   No Comments

links for 2008-05-19

May 18, 2008   No Comments

Compuware 2.0 Rebranding Launched

Well, there’s now some meat behind the announcement of a new three year makeover plan for Compuware. Dubbed Compuware 2.0, the CEO announced the intention to re-brand his company. I questioned whether the new Compuware 2.0 play would mean a more improved focus on Business Service Management. Based on some of the recent (ex)employee(?) comments on my blog, things aren’t all peachy in Compuware 2.0 land.

The COO stated Vantage was key to their new strategy and that more more investments in the Vantage suite to “further distance themselves from the competition”. Now the big question is where would those investments be? Resource monitoring, service monitoring, user experience monitoring, transaction monitoring, BSM?

Launch site:

http://www.wemakeitrockaroundtheworld.com/en/

Of interest:

http://www.motorcityrocks.com/2008/05/comuware-employeees-to-recive-gift-of.htm
http://www.wwj.com/pages/2196498.php?
http://www.businessreviewonline.com/blog/archives/2008/05/#000663
http://detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080516/BIZ/805160344
http://detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080517/BIZ/805170345

One of the goals is to “establish a communications protocol that’s consistent and transparent” appears as a blog. One post, only from the COO at this point and the feeds didn’t work for me. I’d like to see product managers, developers and delivery services folks active and encouraged to discuss how they’re going to adopt Compuware 2.0 in their products. How they’re going to enable Business Service Management and ultimately alignment between business and IT. Heck, the doors open for you to join the conversation on my blog here and share on these topics anytime, just ask!

May 18, 2008   11 Comments

BMC CTO Response to Information Week Gloomy BSM Article

BMC’s CTO Tom Bishop responds to Michael Biddick’s Information Week Article and adds to the conversation.

The article also makes an incorrect generalization by suggesting that smaller vendors do a better job of “playing well with others.” BMC – a charter member of the ‘Big Four’ management vendors – provides solutions that operate well in heterogeneous environments and integrate with the broadest range of technologies possible. This allows organizations to utilize current IT investments instead of replacing and beginning anew. As we tell our customers every day, a correct implementation of BMC’s BSM strategy makes our competitor products better. This is a fundamental difference between BMC and our competitors.

One of the biggest challenges I see personally, am asked by clients and integrators constantly, and see a very large amount of traffic headed to my blog from Google searches is around integration difficulties with the BMC Atrium CMDB. I’d like to invite Tom or some of his team to respond and share more about how client’s investments in other vendor technology and products can be improved, simplified or even realized when they desire to leverage the powerful information in the Atrium CMDB, especially complex service relationships and CI information.

I’m aware of the new(ish) Atrium Integration Engine, but I’m pretty sure we (IBM Tivloli) are not exploiting it in any way formally. Can we get a discussion going or information out there in the BMCDN or other place on integrating BMC Atrium with core IBM Tivoli products. Put the bad blood aside, let’s do it for the customers!

May 18, 2008   2 Comments

links for 2008-05-17

May 16, 2008   No Comments

TBSM v4.1 IF 011 Available

Here.

Addressing APARs:

IZ13211 RADSHELL CAN’T USE HTTPS

When TBSM is configured to connect to Security manager via ssl, the rad_radshell script doesn’t work.

IZ15295 CUSTOMER IS NOT ABLE TO VIEW SLA CHARTS PAGE

When displaying the SLA Charts page from the drop down tool, an error occurs and no chart information is displayed.

IZ15514 HITTING THE TAB WHERE THERE IS NO INSTANCE DEFINED

When viewing the custom canvas, the edit tab displays NoInstanceDefined if no instance was tied to the custom canvas. However, users can still click the tab and see previously displayed data.

IZ19449 TEMPLATE RULE THRESHOLDS ARE INCORRECTLY DISPLAYED

Template rule thresholds are incorrectly displayed after the first rule is viewed. Customer views a template rule with marginal and bad thresholds set, and any other template rule that is viewed after this that has marginal and bad thresholds, displays the values that were seen with the first rule. The marginal and bad threshold values are not updated based on the new rules that are viewed.

May 16, 2008   No Comments