thoughts on business, service and technology operations and management

Random header image... Refresh for more!

links for 2008-07-23

July 22, 2008   No Comments

links for 2008-07-22

July 21, 2008   No Comments

links for 2008-07-19

July 18, 2008   No Comments

OpenNMS Replacing and/or Complementing Netcool/OMNIbus & Impact

The weekly source for hot IT management news and gossip is the IT Management Podcast hosted by Cote’ of Redmonk and John M Willis of Zabovo. This week’s episode featured OpenNMS’s Tarus Balog.

Tarus dropped a few interesting tidbits throughout the conversation around Network Management about a couple very large IBM Tivoli Netcool clients that were moving from or complementing their existing architecture with OpenNMS. One was a large telecommunications company in Italy (Telecom Italia?) and another a very large mobile telecommunications company in Switzerland named Swisscom.

This led to some discussions around product scalability, licensing models, etc. Tarus didn’t have any specifics to share other than one requirement for OpenNMS to handle event storms of 2K-3K per second. He said they’re working through architecture approaches to ensure that their backend databases can continue to scale in ways similar to Netcool/OMNIbus’s in-memory database.

Tarus also mentioned capabilities in OpenNMS on par with what Netcool/Impact offers. I believe he called them Automations. It’d be neat to hear more on this and if they’ll have a library of data source interfaces/integrations similar to Netcool/Impact.

Everything that Tarus and the OpenNMS team does is ultimately driven back into the main code tree for all to take advantage of. The OpenNMS DevCamp kicks off in a week or two where the foundations for OpenNMS 2.0 will be worked on. This is taking place in my backyard down at GA Tech if I recall correctly.

Congrats to the OpenNMS team for your entrance into the telco space with these clients. I also really want to learn more about your Papa John’s deployment and if I heard glimpses of Business Service Management (BSM) there or if you were just using that as an example!

July 18, 2008   3 Comments

links for 2008-07-18

July 17, 2008   No Comments

An IBMers Journey to acquire CA/Wily Product Information

In a post many months back I spoke to why I thought IBM was like an open source company. The analogy was that nearly all of IBM Tivoli’s product, support, best practices and user groups are open to anyone to access. Unfortunately, nearly every other vendor doesn’t have such an approach in place. Here’s my story of my journey to get product information for CA/Wily Introscope and CEM. I’m glad it had a good ending, but it sure could have been easier!

When customer’s ask, it’s usually all hands on deck to figure out how to get things done here at IBM Tivoli. When presented with a challenge on integrating one vendor’s technology with another vendor’s technology, your options vary greatly and depend upon how well vendors choose to play with one another or how open their technologies are.

The task at hand - leverage the powerful data, metrics and KPIs that the CA/Wily Introscope/CEM products provide and incorporate them into aggregate business service management displays within TBSM v4. Simple as it sounds, we ask all of the standard questions. Tell me about the data collected, how its stored, and if there is a standard API or ODBC interface to get at the data. The challenge here with the CA/Wily product is the non-standard JDBC API (and .jar file) it uses for Introscope and the WebServices API for CEM. You really need some documentation and/or examples to get moving here.

These questions usually lead us in one direction or another, but most often the internal emails begin to fly and folks hit Google. I spent nearly six hours executing every known Google trick I know to search for documentation or any other resources on what my options may be. Results - nada. Everything I needed was “behind the firewall” at CA/Wily. I posted a note to my blog, which resulted in a few new paths to follow. One of my regular followers put me in touch with their CA/Wily SME and he shared his expert advice on what they do, but understandably, was uncomfortable providing copies of manuals. (Thanks Jay, Steve, Tom, Abbas)

I found CA/Wily’s User Group/Forums and requested an account. This was sent to an email alias and a nice lady said, as I expected, “you’re not on our customer list”. I replied, this time from my IBM email account stating that I’m sure we’re partners and I’m seeking information for a joint customer on how to accomplish an integration. She forwarded my email to the CA/Wily - IBM Tivoli Relationship Manager and I received a phone call and an email from her. (Thanks Marilyn!)

The CA/Wily Relationship Manager exceeded my expectations and took ownership of the situation. She tracked down account teams in two separate geographies, created a support case and rallied the troops. In the end, I received the necessary manuals and SME contacts I needed to move forward.

I’m pleased with the cooperation I ultimately received, but continue to think that it shouldn’t have to be this difficult. I think this is where the next generation companies will take the leadership roles. Transparency, honesty, “on-demand” information access, “real-time” support and enablement, cooperation between vendors for the client’s benefit, etc. The level of effort it takes to transform into this type of organization is immense, the commitment and investment in FTEs to sustain it for the long haul is significant. The benefits in the long run should be what keeps those clients coming back for more.

We’re heading in the right direction here at IBM and within Tivoli. I do worry though as the times get tough, that these programs and investments will be the first on the chopping block. Every product’s investment plan should fund these initiatives for the long haul. The support model for a community driven approach shouldn’t be thought of as a ratio (1 FTE managing dozens of blogs, wikis, communities, etc.) and that the community must be invested in (incentives, bounties, individual/group goals and objectives - PBC/IDP, etc.).

What are your thoughts on open access and transparency within the vendor community? What are your plans?

July 17, 2008   No Comments

links for 2008-07-17

July 16, 2008   No Comments

links for 2008-07-16

July 15, 2008   No Comments